![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
About TLS Critical Chain Project
Management/
What's the biggest block to cutting NHS waiting lists? - lack of resources? Or could it actually be a conflict of interest for those at the (literal) cutting edge? Read this report – courtesy of Clarke Ching, who was quoting and commenting on an article from the Sunday Times: UK SURGEON USES TOC (THEORY OF CONSTRAINTS) APPROACH TO DOUBLE CAPACITY AND ELIMINATE WAITING LISTS A surgeon in the National Health Service has more than doubled his work rate by introducing a French-style “production line” under which he carries out overlapping operations in different theatres. John Petri, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon, introduced the system after finding himself frustrated at spending time “drinking tea” while patients were being made ready for operations at his Norfolk hospital. The results: Trial figures show that over 50 operating sessions, Petri performed 270 major and minor operations using the dual theatre system. Two colleagues using the traditional single theatre approach together performed only 225 operations. How did he do this? It looks like he either knowingly or intuitively used TOC's process of on going improvement (aka The Five Focusing Steps), namely: Identify the constraint First, he has identified himself – or surgeons in general - as the current system constraint: “It took me some time to understand how the British system worked but I could not understand why it had waiting lists. When I asked, people would talk about resources. What I saw was that surgeons spent chunks of their time idle waiting to operate,” he said. Second, he’s figured out how to exploit himself as the constraint – i.e. how to make him as efficient as possible: He operates on one patient while the next is prepared in a second theatre. Petri moves on to the second patient while leaving a junior to finish the first. By the time the second operation is near ing completion, a third patient is waiting for him in the original theatre. Third, he’s subordinated the other resources in the process to make sure he is as busy as possible: Petri convinced anaesthetists and theatre staff to change the way they worked but was unable to persuade fellow surgeons to join the initiative. Ahhh, but he wasn’t always the constraint, it looks like it was once theatre space. Petri persuaded his boss to spend some money to 4) ELEVATE the previous constraint. This was enough to give the theatres spare capacity so that Petri himself was the constraint. He persuaded his chief executive to carry out a trial of his “dual operating” idea in 2001 and to build a new theatre. And, other hospitals will perhaps have different constraints: Anne Moore, of the Royal College of Surgeons, said lack of resources meant “dual operating” was not always viable: “There is nothing to stop surgeons operating Petri’s system. In America surgeons move between as many as 12 theatres but in the UK there are not enough anaesthetists, theatres or other staff to make it work.” But, perhaps that’s not the biggest problem: Petri’s initiative has been welcomed by his hospital managers who believe it could become a model to cut NHS waiting lists. It is being shunned, however, by his colleagues some of whom, he believes, may be deterred by “the sheer hard work” involved in the new system. Doctors, afraid of hard work? Hmmm, I doubt many of them are afraid of hard work … it takes a lot of work to become a doctor …. perhaps there’s something else going on? There could be drawbacks for surgeons employing Petri’s methods. As his NHS waiting list has been cut, so the incentive for patients to employ him privately has diminished.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||